Prison and Escape
Saeed Sheikh was arrested in India in 1994 while
on a kidnapping mission designed to trade Western tourists for Kashmiri
separatists. [ABC
News, 2/7/02] The ISI paid his legal fees, but he was nonetheless sentenced
to a long prison term in an Indian jail. [Washington
Post, 5/3/02] While in prison, his natural abilities soon allowed him
to become the leader of the jail’s large Muslim population. By his own
admission, he "lived practically like a Mafia don." [London
Times, 8/21/02] It has been claimed that in 1999, British intelligence
secretly offered Saeed an amnesty and the ability to "live in London a
free man" if he would reveal his links to al-Qaeda. He apparently refused.
[Daily Mail, 7/16/02, London
Times, 7/16/02] Even more curiously, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
suggested in March 2002, "There are many in Musharraf's government who
believe that Saeed Sheikh's power comes not from the ISI, but from his
connections with our own CIA. The theory is that ... Saeed Sheikh was bought
and paid for." [Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review, 3/3/02]
In December 1999, terrorists hijacked an Indian
Airlines aircraft and flew it to Kandahar, Afghanistan. After an eight-day
standoff, the 155 hostages were released in exchange for Saeed and two
other three Pakistani terrorists held by India. [BBC,
12/31/99] He must have been already highly valued by al-Qaeda, because
the hijacking appears to have been largely funded and carried out by them.
[CNN,
6/13/02, New
York Times, 12/6/01] Saeed stayed at a Kandahar guesthouse for several
days, conferring with Taliban leader Mullah Muhammad Omar and Osama bin
Laden. An ISI colonel then escorted him to a safe house in Pakistan. [Vanity
Fair, 8/02]
Saeed Keeps Busy
In his roughly two years of freedom before 9/11,
Saeed was a very busy terrorist. According to Newsweek, once in Pakistan,
Saeed "lived openly - and opulently - in a wealthy Lahore neighborhood.
US sources say he did little to hide his connections to terrorist organizations,
and even attended swanky parties attended by senior Pakistani government
officials." The US government inferred that he was a "protected asset"
of the ISI. [Newsweek, 3/13/02]
In fact, his house was given to him by the ISI. [Vanity
Fair, 8/02] Even more remarkably, the media reported that Saeed was
freely able to return to Britain [Press
Trust of India, 1/3/00], just as if he had accepted Britain's secret
amnesty offer. He visited his parents in Britain in 2000 and again in early
2001. [Vanity Fair, 8/02, BBC,
7/16/02, Telegraph,
7/16/02] The British citizens kidnapped by Saeed in 1994 called the
government's decision not to try him a "disgrace" and "scandalous." [Press
Trust of India, 1/3/00]
It as been reported that Saeed helped train the
hijackers. [Telegraph,
9/30/01] Presumably this happened in Afghanistan, where he trained
others and where he traveled regularly. [New
York Times, 2/25/02, National
Post, 2/26/02, Guardian,
7/16/02, India Today, 2/25/02]
He also reportedly helped devise a secure, encrypted Web-based communications
system for al-Qaeda. "His future in the network seemed limitless; there
was even talk of one day succeeding bin Laden." [Vanity
Fair, 8/02, Telegraph,
7/16/02]
But at the same time, much of his time was spent
working with the ISI. He worked with Ijaz Shah, a former ISI official in
charge of handling two terrorist groups, Lieutenant-General Mohammad Aziz
Khan, also a former deputy chief of the ISI in charge of relations with
Jaish-e-Mohammad, and Brigadier Abdullah, a former ISI officer. He was
well known to other senior ISI officers. [National
Post, 2/26/02, Guardian,
7/16/02, India Today, 2/25/02]
How much of his work with al-Qaeda was done on the orders of the ISI is
not known.
Saeed's 9/11 Role is First Revealed
By now, the al-Qaeda 9/11 plot was in motion.
Someone in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), using an alias, periodically
wired money to and from hijackers Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between
June 2000 and the day before 9/11. [MSNBC,
12/11/01] The identity of this person
has been a highly disputed subject. On September 23, 2001, it was first
reported that authorities were now (finally) looking for Saeed Sheikh,
though it wasn't explained why. [London
Times, 9/23/01] The next day, it was reported that the 9/11 "paymaster"
had been found, using the alias "Mustafa Ahmed." [Newsweek,
9/24/01] On October 1, 2001, the Guardian reported, "The man at the
center of the financial web is believed to be Sheikh Saeed, also known
as Mustafa Mohamed Ahmad," but it wasn't immediately clear who this person
was. [Guardian,
10/1/01] On October 6, CNN revealed that "US investigators now believe
Sheik Syed, using the alias Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad, sent more than $100,000
from Pakistan to Mohamed Atta." More importantly, CNN confirmed that this
was in fact the same Saeed Sheikh who had been released from an Indian
prison in 1999. [CNN,
10/6/01]
Enter Lt. Gen. Mahmood and the ISI
On October 7, 2001, Pakistani President Musharraf
fired Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed, the head of the ISI. The next day, some newspapers,
mostly in India but also in Pakistan, shockingly said he was fired for
his role in the 9/11 attacks. [Press Trust
of India, 10/8/01] For instance, a Pakistani newspaper stated, "Lt.
Gen. Mahmood Ahmed has been replaced after the FBI investigators established
credible links between him and Umar Sheikh, one of the three militants
released in exchange for passengers of the hijacked Indian Airlines plane
in 1999... Informed sources said there were enough indications with the
US intelligence agencies that it was at Gen. Mahmood's instruction that
Sheikh had transferred 100,000 US dollars into the account of Mohammed
Atta..." [Dawn, 10/9/01] Indian newspapers
claimed that Indian intelligence had been instrumental in helping to establish
the connection. [Times
of India, 10/9/01, India Today,
10/15/01, Agence France-Presse, 10/10/01,
Daily
Excelsior, 10/18/01] Yet this explosive story was barely mentioned
in the West. [Australian, 10/10/01,
AFP,
10/10/01] In the US, surprisingly, the only mention was in a one short
piece in the Wall Street Journal, mentioning that, "The US authorities
... confirm[ed] the fact that $100,000 [was] wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed
Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh at the insistence of General Mahmood."
[Wall Street
Journal, 10/10/01] Most other Western accounts simply explained Mahmood
was fired for being too close to the Taliban. [London
Times, 10/9/01, Guardian, 10/9/01]
If true, the story would strongly suggest that
the ISI played a very large role in the 9/11 attacks. Why the silence on
such an important story? One might credit skepticism that it was merely
Indian propaganda. But a larger pattern, detailed below, suggests there
is something more to the media's attitude: a strong reluctance to print
any evidence suggesting Pakistan was behind the 9/11 attacks.
Mahmood's sudden and complete disappearance also
seems curious. He is reportedly living under "virtual house arrest" [Asia
Times, 1/5/02], and has refused to speak to reporters since being fired.
[AP, 2/21/02] Other former ISI Directors
living in Pakistan seemingly even more supportive of the Taliban continue
to be very vocal (such as Lt. Gen. Hamid Gul, for instance [New
Yorker, 12/3/01]), and numerous other ISI officers have supported the
Taliban in seeming defiance of Musharraf's wishes and not faced house arrest.
[Guardian,
5/25/02] |
~ ~
Musharraf with
Gen. Mahmood
|
~~~
Chapter
1
- Chapter 2 - Chapter 3
- Chapter 4
- Chapter 5
- Chapter 6
- Chapter 7
- Chapter 8
- Chapter 9
|